Am 25.01.2013 18:57, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > Just to be clear, RHEL != Fedora. Red Hat policy for RHEL kernel is not acceptable to Fedora and Fedora kernel > continues to have the patches split out. You cannot use that to defend MySQL policies here. You can do whatever > you want to do for the MySQL "enterprise edition" which is a commercial product but the community project should > have transparency and openness in how it handles bugs, security issues, test cases etc. If you are willing to > commit to that, that is a step forward. this is all nice and fine but keep in mind that Fedora is the base for RHEL applications may be certified for mysql and yes you are unsopported to run them at all on Fedora but run them additionally on a fork of mysql which maybe more and more incompatible over the years you are out of hope and have not anything from the subjective freedom if there is no way to have both, mysqld AND mariadb Fedora should do itself a favour and keep mysqld, not for now - forever or as long not most other software supports mariadb explicitly which is not the case now has mysqld any technical problem which makes it unstable? no it has not! is mariadb supported from any software which does not for mysqld? not it does not! is mysqld opensource? yes it is! did we had enough subsystem changes the last few years? yes - we had way too much for the time-window!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
