On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Scott Schmit <i.grok@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Current: > em1 -> enp2s0 That is expected, and actually the right thing to do. Udev cannot apply such "it looks like it is embedded" heuristics for very practical technical reasons. There is no reliable information about that on the system, so this logic will break sooner or later. There is also no sane way to share the namespace with the embedded interface indices defined by the firmware. It should never have been done by biosdevname that way. > em2 -> eno1 > em3 -> eno2 Ouch, is that really the case? If that's what you see on your box, then biosdevname would have "invented" its own numbers for the *fixed* SMBIOS provided index numbers, and rebased them to something different. That would be really weird. Thanks, Kay -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
