On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 23:03 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > It's best to rip the bandage of this in one release. > > The churn from this should have been more or less covered when we > implement biosdevname so the fallout from this change should be minimal > if any... I see the 's' word in there ;) That's always the hope, and then we meet the cold reality, where someone just patched 'em1' into everything and hoped that was good enough. But sure, 'damn the torpedoes' is a viable approach too. I guess I was just kind of hoping F19 would be a release without yet more churn in the core system where we could try and stabilize things a bit. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
