On 01/31/2013 08:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 21:17 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
I think that's not the point, one of the two suites will be dominant
and you can't provide both of them on a live image for example.
LibreOffice was introduced to our live images and we hit target 1GB,
do you really think it could be useful having a larger image just
because you want to provide both of the office suites?
The proposal explicitly says that it doesn't envisage including OO on
any images or in any default install configurations, simply adding it as
an option in the package repositories.
Which doesn't really need a FESCo approval ... just a package review.
Presumably it was proposed as a feature for the publicity implications.
Yeah well perhaps "features" and "changes" should be separated...
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
