On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 21:17 +0100, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote: > > > >> I think that's not the point, one of the two suites will be dominant > >> and you can't provide both of them on a live image for example. > >> LibreOffice was introduced to our live images and we hit target 1GB, > >> do you really think it could be useful having a larger image just > >> because you want to provide both of the office suites? > > > > The proposal explicitly says that it doesn't envisage including OO on > > any images or in any default install configurations, simply adding it as > > an option in the package repositories. > > Which doesn't really need a FESCo approval ... just a package review. Presumably it was proposed as a feature for the publicity implications. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
