On 01/30/2013 01:05 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: >> Actually a lot of research and reason went into GNOME 3's development >> [1], > That's about as relevant as "a lot of coding went into $project", > which is... not a whole lot when considering which project to make the > default. But every release is not a decision point, "which desktop will we make default this time?" Certainly it is *not* a given or granted that any given software project we have as an upstream has done *any* usability or user experience research whatsoever, so in that aspect GNOME is pretty rare. >> and we picked it up because we are an upstream distro [2]. > GNOME isn't the only possible upstream. We picked it up at that time > implicitly because it was presented as an upgrade instead of basically > a new project with a new direction. I meant in the sense, 'do we stick with GNOME 2.x or move to 3.x" FWIW. > >> https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design#Research.2C_testing_and_validation > To save others time... the "testing and validation" part has no > results on the wiki that I can see. That's a very fair point: I'd very much like to see data there as well. ~m -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
