On Tuesday, January 29, 2013, Olav Vitters wrote:
>MATE developers actually have GNOME git accounts now.
I know that.
>GNOME classic is not the same as a fallback mode.
I am skeptical.
> MATE did not have that much development, nor that many developers if you
compare it to the amount of work done between a GNOME 2.x release.
Paid full time employees vs non paid hobbyists.
>Could you reference the bugs that GNOME 3 has problems with systemd?
>Because it works fine for me.
You know how search RHBZ?
> Is it really that scary for you guys to think about something else besides
> Gnome 3 and KDE?
>
> Not enough support? Then step up and quit whining. You know how to help,
> Red Hat employees. Don't be selfish. This is Fedora not RHEL. This is a
> community based distribution not Red Hats playground. Please feel free to
> correct me if I'm wrong.
I suggest you actually do some work instead of showing that you dislike
Red Hat employees.
> Done.
> Everyone loves to dance around the fact about what Fedora is or isn't.
>
> This isn't one persons decision and its not 2003.
>
> Get with the times. Your projects failed. Sure a lot of people like it.
> Then again a lot of people don't. And we wonder why there are less people
> using Fedora.
You say "projects": which projects exactly?
> And then we wonder why MATE and Cinnamon got the most press coverage in
> Fedora 18 and why there has been a huge user spike in the last 30 days. It
> hasn't been because of systemd, Gnome 3.6, and Anaconda 18. You are on
> serious drugs if you believe that.
>"serious drugs"
>Quit with attacking people, then maybe people will actually listen. At
>the moment you are very vague and unspecific (e.g. bug references, not
>vague claims). The only think you make clear is that you're angry.
Nobody has been listening for the last 3 years.
Dan
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
