On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:52:03AM -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Monday, January 28, 2013, M�ir�n Duffy wrote: > > On 01/28/2013 02:06 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > You don't see the point of MATE or Cinnamon? How long did you play > with > > them 5 minutes? > > Do you remember the GNOME 1.x => 2.x transition? Similarly to how there > are forks of GNOME now to 'keep the GNOME 2 candle burning,' there were > forks of GNOME 1.x to 'keep the GNOME 1 candle burning.' > > Do you remember what they were called? I didn't; I had to look 'em up. > Do you ever wonder what happened to them? Dead projects nobody seems to > remember. Do we really want to switch to a desktop that history has > shown is likely to become a dead project in a few years? > > [1]http://osdir.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1295 > > It also doesn't seem smart to switch from a desktop on the basis that > Linus Torvalds and Alan Cox - kernel developers, not UI experts or even > typical desktop users by any means - don't like it. I think switching > the desktop that has been our default for over 10 years and 18 releases > requires just a bit more research and reason than that. > > ~m > > Lets all listen to Miami because she did a great job with anaconda 18 UI > design,�knows more than Linus, Alan Cox and is absolutely right on > everything!� > Dan You are completely out of line here, please stop this or I'll ask the hall monitor to take action. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
