On Sáb, 2013-01-26 at 13:13 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qua, 2013-01-16 at 15:36 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 02:26:00PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 04:12:29 +0100, xning wrote: > > > > Shall we should modify '-g' to '-g3' to have gcc save the macro > > > > info? So when we install *-debuginfo packages, we can look up a > > > > macro definition, just like we can look up a function definition. > > > > > > That would be great, I have not found any official request for it, there was > > > only short -g3 discussion in: > > > Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-06-18) > > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/168884.html > > > > > > The new -g3 format by Jakub Jelinek has only very small debug info size > > > increase requirement (FIXME: missing numbers here). > > > > The tests performed on average meant that all or most of the space savings > > thanks to dwz were consumed again by the .debug_macro addition (+ .debug_str > > growth), which is why I've given up on the request to use -g3 in > > RPM_OPT_FLAGS by default. > > What is state of this macro , to have -g3 we need update what ? rpm ? > rpmbuild ? we have already gcc-4.8 in rawhide mirrors gcc-4.8.0-0.6.fc19.src.rpm 24-Jan-2013 12:36 75M RPM Package -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
