On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 21:57 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:51:14PM -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > Simo Sorce <simo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > [...] B) I will *not* trust an update system that cuts me out of my > > > remote server and make me *hope* it will come up later. If yum > > > freaks out for *whatever* reason I want to be there with an > > > emergency shell open [...] I've been saved more than once by a > > > shell open during changes in the configuration or upgrades, that is > > > non-negotiable to me. [...] > > > > I agree that this capability is very important. > > Nobody has suggested removing it. It'll continue to work as well (or as > badly, if you prefer) as it currently does. Unfortunately, lately I have the impression you need to state even obvious things very clearly lest they are removed 'to improve' the system. So, just making it clear. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
