Re: comps' "standard" group spring cleaning?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:40:40 +0100
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> <sarcasm>oh yeah "ss" is a pretty clear and self explaining
> command</sarcasm>
> 
> if people would develop SMART repalcements they would call the
> binaries identical with compatible command line switches so a
> "Obsoletes: whatever" would not change the USER INTERFACES

ss is not command line compatible with netstart AFAIK. 
It provides similar information... 

> fine, you can add addtionoal command line options, you can even
> add new specialized binaries in the same package but say
> "command A with other options" replaces "well known B" is
> pretty dumb at all

It takes a long time as we see for new replacements to gain traction,
but things change. :) 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux