On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:55:21 -0500 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: > > >ok, I guess I could try again. Can we remove prelink? > > >What does it get us these days? > > Has anything changed about prelink since the last time it was > > discussed here? > > "prelink should not mess with running executables": > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-July/169819.html ? > > Or even since "prelink: is it worth it?": > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-July/034529.html > > Hardware is faster and any benefit less necessary, making it even > less worth the tradeoffs? I'd like to see some numbers. Additionally, a number of things in fedora are now being built with PIE and thus cannot be prelinked. (ok, "a number" is probibly an exaggeration, but it's a few at least). kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
