On 12/27/2012 10:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:48:45 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
Continue talking to the other people,
[snip]
Yes, this is the correct action. But it's hard to talk to people if
they don't reply at all or not in a meaningful way. I'm not talking
about reviews making progress, possibly with the help of others. I'm
talking about reviews stalled because both submitter and reviewer seems
to have given up for a long time, ignoring input from others.
A specific example might be helpful at this point. What you've described
here is not what you've described in the opening post. If you've followed
the policy for stalled reviews, with both the submitter and the reviewer
not responding, I wonder who closes your own review request as duplicate?
That sounds wrong to me.
Perhaps you're right. Let's apply the unresponsive reviewer policy even
though I'm, not the submitter. I have missed that this is actually
perfectly OK. And you are also right in that I could submit my own
version forcing the stalled review to close it as duplicate or not.
It's only if all these actions fail there actually is a problem.
Case closed for now, thanks for help!
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
