On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Björn Persson <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have filed a ticket for FESCo's consideration on the fedup situation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/982
No ISO based or graphical upgrade by itself is a severe regression but having no supported upgrade path that is secure is I think is just unacceptable.
Rahul
Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that was both
secure and practical anyway, but I agree. As long as people are being
discouraged from upgrading by Yum because it's "unsupported", removing
the only "supported" and secure upgrade method is definitely a
regression, and quite irresponsible.
I have filed a ticket for FESCo's consideration on the fedup situation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/982
No ISO based or graphical upgrade by itself is a severe regression but having no supported upgrade path that is secure is I think is just unacceptable.
Rahul
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
