----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Björn Persson < > bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote: > > > Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that was > both > secure and practical anyway, but I agree. As long as people are being > discouraged from upgrading by Yum because it's "unsupported", > removing > the only "supported" and secure upgrade method is definitely a > regression, and quite irresponsible. > > > I have filed a ticket for FESCo's consideration on the fedup > situation > > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/982 FESCo already agreed not to block on it as part of https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/960 I'm going to check logs, if media method was considered and as far as I understand, Will wants the support for final. Jaroslav > No ISO based or graphical upgrade by itself is a severe regression > but having no supported upgrade path that is secure is I think is > just unacceptable. > > Rahul > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
