On 12/17/2012 03:15 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Björn Persson
<bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that was both
secure and practical anyway, but I agree. As long as people are being
discouraged from upgrading by Yum because it's "unsupported", removing
the only "supported" and secure upgrade method is definitely a
regression, and quite irresponsible.
I have filed a ticket for FESCo's consideration on the fedup situation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/982
No ISO based or graphical upgrade by itself is a severe regression but
having no supported upgrade path that is secure is I think is just
unacceptable.
Rahul
I don't think FESCo should interfere according to the process:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
Imho you can join their next go/no-go meeting and try to persuade all
stakeholders.
Marcela
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
