On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 12:21 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:42:15AM -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote: > > > I think we do need more clarity on "system-wide/defaults changing > > > features or critical path components". What's the threshold for > > > defaults? (LVM, for a specific example.) What's the threshold for a > > > change to a critical path component? > > We were discussing even critpaths, but currently is in critical path > > almost everything. > > If true, I think that asking for clarity on the thresholds is even more > important. If almost everything really is on the critical path, we need to > either a) find a way to reduce that or b) recognize it and treat features > more carefully. It's not really true, no, though it can seem that way. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/lists/critpath?tg_format=plain&collctn_list=f18 is the current F18 critpath list. It's 583 packages; quite big, but a long way from 'almost everything'. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
