Re: RFC: Feature process improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:42:15AM -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
> > I think we do need more clarity on "system-wide/defaults changing
> > features or critical path components". What's the threshold for
> > defaults? (LVM, for a specific example.) What's the threshold for a
> > change to a critical path component?
> We were discussing even critpaths, but currently is in critical path
> almost everything. 

If true, I think that asking for clarity on the thresholds is even more
important. If almost everything really is on the critical path, we need to
either a) find a way to reduce that or b) recognize it and treat features
more carefully.

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux