----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:21:01 AM > Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:08:59PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > this proposal was recently linked in various places, so let's > > formally > > introduce it: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mmaslano/Feature_process > > As discussed earlier, I liked the three-tier approach better, but I'm > in > favor of any improvement, which I think this clearly is. > > I think we do need more clarity on "system-wide/defaults changing > features or > critical path components". What's the threshold for defaults? (LVM, > for a > specific example.) What's the threshold for a change to a critical > path > component? > > -- > Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> We were discussing even critpaths, but currently is in critical path almost everything. Maybe splitting packages into tiers wouldn't be bad, but I have no idea how to do it. -- Marcela -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
