Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I think a good way to approach this is by looking for the interesting
> usecases for a minimal installation:
>
> A) Containers
> B) VMs
> C) Bare-Metal Servers
> D) Paranoid people (not relevant)
> E) Embedded (out of focus for Fedora)

I don't believe embedded is out of focus for Fedora, I already have several hundred such systems, soon likely to scale into the thousands.  It works quite well for this and I don't see any reason @core can't work to their benefit as well.

--
John Florian

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux