Re: iprutils -- should this be pulled in by anaconda instead of in core?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 08:41:00AM -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> > I know anaconda currently does some magic to install storage-related
> > packages; should this be included there rather than on the minimal list?
> > It's not a big package, but unless it's necessary I don't think we want to
> > force it on every system everywhere, do we?
> anaconda would only need to do that if those utilities are required to
> activate or otherwise make the device available.

If that's _not_ the case, I don't see why they'd be in core either. If one
of the package maintainers doesn't respond I'll ping them and ask.

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux