Re: Fedora Minimal Core SIG -- please join if you're interested

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > I wonder whether "Core" is a good word for Fedora Minimal
> > installation SIG. Because currently the minimal installation uses
> > @base yum group. @core group is included always, whether you want
> > it
> > or not. If you really want to have a_core_  system, you must use
> > kickstart like this:
> >
> > %packages --nobase %end
> 
> This isn't true anymore.
> 
> --nobase doesn't do anything because there is no @base.  It was
> renamed
> to @standard, and it's no longer selected by default in kickstart.
> 
> Also, the minimal install (GUI or TUI) does %packages \n %end as
> well,
> only @core gets installed.  So the result is the same as doing the
> kickstart.

Thanks for info. I reported a bug in anaconda to update the kickstart documentation:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875650

That means that "Minimal Core SIG" or "Core SIG" now makes even more sense :-)
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux