On 12. 11. 2012 at 01:28:10, Seth Vidal wrote: > On Sat, 10 Nov 2012, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> - depends on Python stack > > > > +1, we really need to get Python out of the minimal installation. > > > > The focus should be on replacing the existing Python-based packages in the > > minimum set (e.g. yum) by native replacements (e.g. zif). Adding more > > Python stuff with additional Python dependencies is a step backwards. > > > > I really don't understand why a core system component such as firewalld is > > implemented in Python! > > Yum will likely be replaced with dnf afaik. I don't think zif is under > consideration at all. Yes, that's the plan. But dnf is still Python. So if we really want to get Python out of minimal install, there is a room for possible alternatives I guess. But none of this is certainly happening for at least a year or two, we don't want to break things by rushing. Thanks Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
