Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Being stricter about having viable contingency plans for features like
> this (ones that require coordination and can potentially block us if they
> aren't done/done correctly) is one possible way to address this type of
> situation in the future.
And it's the right way. I'd go as far as saying that features with no
(viable) contingency plan should be blanket-rejected.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
