On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:45:56AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > I wonder whether "Core" is a good word for Fedora Minimal installation > SIG. Because currently the minimal installation uses @base yum group. > @core group is included always, whether you want it or not. If you really > want to have a _core_ system, you must use kickstart like this: There is no more @base group -- it's @standard now. Can't find the message about it right now. But yeah, your point still stands. > That is even smaller than default minimal installation. But I understand > this initiative is related to the default minimal installation as > displayed in anaconda. I was actually more focused on the actual core group, in line with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_groups#Core But, I think that it's reasonable for this group to be concerned with both; the definition should probably be expanded. The reason I didn't want just "Fedora Minimal" is that sounds too much like an ideological effort to make Fedora into an ultra-tiny distro. But the exact name isn't important to me and if others think it'd be better to just be Minimal I'm totally okay with that. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
