Re: Attention, dependency fighters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:56:30PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> long story short, it's firewalld. Its deps are pretty heavy for
>> something that's supposed to be in minimal. I'm sure twoerner would
>> welcome help in pruning the deps if it's possible. it should at least be
>> possible for it not to depend on both pygobject2 and pygobject3, one
>> would think :)
>
>
> Maybe we could have a release criterion which states that the minimal
> install doesn't have anything which pulls in the X libraries (or Wayland)?
>
> That's not a _completely_ arbitrary line in the sand. Probably the issue
> here is just a matter of what goes in what subpackage.

Problem with that is that you get into flame wars about what's
necessary. I would argue that on a minimal install for cloud where you
have no web browser to view localhost that a web service for logs
isn't minimal and hence isn't necessary, it seems others disagree.

Peter
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux