On 8 Nov 2012 07:35, "Kevin Kofler" <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > The new anaconda UI and related features are more or less entirely the
> > cause of the slip.
>
> This shows that those changes should not have been done, or at least not in
> this way.
Hindsight is a fabulous thing, I suspect the anaconda developers would agree with you looking back. Its a large body of code dependent on a lots of pieces.
> > Secure boot support is also not done yet (waiting on the signature for
> > shim to get sorted out by legal), though I don't know whether FESCo yet
> > absolutely decided that has to be in for Beta.
>
> And Restricted Boot support just needs to go away!
And with it will go Fedora's ability to support a lot of new hardware moving forward and I don't believe that's good for anyone. The developers have done a lot of work to make it easily handle a vast amount of use cases and I think its great the work they've done. The hardware is coming so its pointless for us to stick our heads in the sand.
Besides this thread is a about beta slip. Not pros and cons of already approved feature.
Peter
Peter
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
