On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 21:28 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 11/01/2012 08:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > The other thing that we mustn't forget are major changes that aren't > > put through the feature process, but slip in "via the back door". > > As far as I know you are not obligated to participate in the feature > process and what do you exactly define as slip in "via the back door" ? 'not participate in the feature process', I think =) I think I once proposed that FESCo should formally have the ability to declare that a given change ought to be a feature and force it through the feature process, but that proposal was rejected. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
