----- Original Message ----- > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:21PM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > >> > That sounds good. Maybe recast those ideas as three levels? > >> > - Critical Path Feature > >> > - Other Enhancement Feature > >> > - New Leaf Feature > >> We were thinking with a few folks more about "Self contained > >> feature" > >> but yeah, there's a lack of real definition. > > > > I think "Leaf" is better than "Self contained", since it's unlikely > > for the > > feature to have zero outside dependencies. I think it'd be fine for > > such a > > feature to rely on small changes to existing packages (version > > updates, > > say). > > I'd argue that this isn't a "feature" ... otherwise we could > advertise > every version upgrade as feature. > If it does not affect a large amount of users it is simply a version > upgrade not a "fedora feature". The question is - how do you know if it affects large amount of users, it's not an important one, without letting people know, there's such feature? Jaroslav > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
