On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:21PM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >> > That sounds good. Maybe recast those ideas as three levels? >> > - Critical Path Feature >> > - Other Enhancement Feature >> > - New Leaf Feature >> We were thinking with a few folks more about "Self contained feature" >> but yeah, there's a lack of real definition. > > I think "Leaf" is better than "Self contained", since it's unlikely for the > feature to have zero outside dependencies. I think it'd be fine for such a > feature to rely on small changes to existing packages (version updates, > say). I'd argue that this isn't a "feature" ... otherwise we could advertise every version upgrade as feature. If it does not affect a large amount of users it is simply a version upgrade not a "fedora feature". -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
