On 10/31/2012 09:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:50:51AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 10/30/2012 06:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
How is it that we're even considering shipping this version for F18?
For any other package, we'd be telling the maintainer to hold off
till F19. The rest of us don't get to be doing major feature
development post-beta-freeze.
That's what I have been asking this whole time and no one from FESCO
bothered to answer.
What's the rush shipping it now? Why not delay-it until F19 when it
has further stabilized?
One might also ask, what's the rush getting F18 out? Why not
just declare that as a one-off it's going to be a 9 month cycle.
(libvirt/libguestfs/selinux integration could certainly use that time ...)
Given the current state of F18 I agree let's lengthen this release cycle
up to 9 months and arguably we should lengthen the whole development
cycle to 9 months from now on.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
