Re: replacing rsyslogd in minimal with journald [was Re: systemd requires HTTP server and serves QR codes]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9 October 2012 16:08, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 09.10.12 15:41, Stephen John Smoogen (smooge@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>
>> On 9 October 2012 15:24, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 09.10.12 16:53, Simo Sorce (simo@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>>
>> > If you want audit-like semantics with crashing if we cannot write, then
>> > use something else, not the journal. The journal is supposed to be
>> > robust and do the right thing so that you can leave it unnatteneded and
>> > whatever happens it didn't spill the disk or become unavailable. It's
>> > supposed to be "zero maintainance".
>>
>> So in those cases rsyslog would be required, but would be seen as a
>> post-install step.
>>
>> EG what you are looking at is building a GNOME-OS and for those sorts
>> of tablets, etc the journal is right for that. The other cases like at
>> a Hospital, trading firm or various .gov.XX then having rsyslog
>> installed with audit post would be the way to get the needed features.
>
> This is BS. The journal is for most folks, not just GNOME users.

Ugh.. look I was trying to restate exactly what you said in previous
emails to make sure I understood what you were saying and to show I
agreed where that is coming from.. and it looks like I dropped some
packets somewhere

By GNOME-OS I meant a particular use-case where a journal would be
useful and it is built for like you said in previous emails. Change
GNOME-OS to Fedora, KDE-OS, Mozilla-OS, whatever.. it is a use case
for a lot of people.

Sites that need specialized big business needs are going to need
something like rsyslog because they have limited case issues.. like
never over-writing logs, halting when logs fill up, etc. Those are
written in regulations that aren't going to change in anytime before
say RHEL-10 comes out.

> How many people actually enable "auditctl -f2"? There's probably not
> many except a few three letter agencies and similar folks.

The hospital servers I helped work with had to have it for HIPAA and
SOX Banes. The money systems that had PCI-DSS also had it on some. But
I am agreeing with you it is a small case.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
"Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it."
Linus Torvalds
"Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh
so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I
recommend pleasant. You may quote me."  —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux