Re: abrt server report: 20121004

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 04:52:19PM +0200, Richard Marko wrote:

 > 
 > kernel                                       220   ▁▂▄▅▇▇█

Nice graphs!

 > What's this about?
 > ------------------
 > 
 > These are the statistics generated by ABRT Server deployed on [1].
 > 
 > We are going to send these reports weekly as they should help developers
 > prioritize their work. We expect them to become more and more accurate
 > as more people will start using new versions of ABRT with simplified
 > reporting [2].
 > 
 > Note that kernel is incorrectly blamed as the most destabilized
 > component as we started handling kerneloops reports only last week.

 > Feedback is really appreciated mainly on these topics:
 >  - structure of this email,
 >  - clustering quality,
 >  - backtrace quality,
 >  - kerneloops processing.

Feature request:
Can you do the same backtrace hashing abrt does, and provide a link to any
bugs in bugzilla with the abrt_hash in the whiteboard ?

	Dave

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux