On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:02:43AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 04:52:19PM +0200, Richard Marko wrote: > > > > > kernel 220 ▁▂▄▅▇▇█ > > Nice graphs! > > > What's this about? > > ------------------ > > > > These are the statistics generated by ABRT Server deployed on [1]. > > > > We are going to send these reports weekly as they should help developers > > prioritize their work. We expect them to become more and more accurate > > as more people will start using new versions of ABRT with simplified > > reporting [2]. > > > > Note that kernel is incorrectly blamed as the most destabilized > > component as we started handling kerneloops reports only last week. > > > Feedback is really appreciated mainly on these topics: > > - structure of this email, > > - clustering quality, > > - backtrace quality, > > - kerneloops processing. > > Feature request: > Can you do the same backtrace hashing abrt does, and provide a link to any > bugs in bugzilla with the abrt_hash in the whiteboard ? Never mind. It seems you do that, and I was looking at reports where no bug had been filed. Perhaps print "no bug filed yet" in that case ? Dave -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
