Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-08-31 12:32, John.Florian@xxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>
I'd prefer to avoid a list... how about:
 >
> "This site provides status only for services managed directly by Fedora
 > Infrastructure"

That's short and simple and drives the point home clear enough, I think.

I preferred the list. The thing is, you can't assume everyone knows what is and isn't managed by Infrastructure. This would just change the question from 'why isn't Bugzilla listed?' to 'why isn't Bugzilla listed? isn't it maintained by infrastructure?'
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux