On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:19 PM, <John.Florian@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 08/31/2012 12:46:31: > >> From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> >> To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Date: 08/31/2012 12:47 >> Subject: Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org >> Sent by: devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:21:26 -0500 >> Jon Ciesla <limburgher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > >> I might have missed something, but are there plans to add bugzilla >> > >> to this? >> > > >> > > It was suggested, but we don't actually run bugzilla.redhat.com or >> > > have anything to do with it. So it would be a bit difficult to try >> > > and report status on it when all we could see is 'it's down' or 'it >> > > seems to be up now' >> > >> > That by itself would be enough for me. And for anyone who sees some >> > failure and has no idea what's going on. Even with a not saying >> > "maintained by RH, not Fedora Inf", or somesuch. >> >> I'd really like to avoid that, because it would lead to: >> >> "when is it going to be up?" -> no idea. >> "It works for me, but not for otheruser, is there a network problem?" >> -> no idea. >> "You are saying it's down, but it's up for me" (mark it up, site goes >> down again because of some ongoing problem) "Now it's down, please mark >> it down again" -> If we managed it, we would know the ongoing issue and >> could update when it was approprate/fully back up. >> >> And cases where we mark it down, when it's not, or only for some users, >> etc. >> >> It also opens the door for "Oh, can you monitor my fedora related site >> and report on it there?" which I REALLY don't want to do. The updates >> are a manual process, so it's already another step someone in >> Infrastructure has to do when there is an outage. >> >> Lets keep it to sites that Fedora Infrastructure directly manages. >> >> kevin >> [attachment "signature.asc" deleted by John Florian/EngMOp/MAS/DCC] -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > That makes lots of sense, but I suspect you'll get just as many "why isn't > bugzilla shown here?" questions ... unless maybe the page had some hint that > it only monitors sites directly managed by the Fedora Project, which is why > sites like bugzilla, etc., etc. are not shown here. I see your point, but I'm swayed by Kevin's logic. -J > -- > John Florian > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
