> From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: 08/31/2012 13:56
> Subject: Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org
> Sent by: devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:51:22 -0500
> Jon Ciesla <limburgher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > That makes lots of sense, but I suspect you'll get just as many
> > > "why isn't bugzilla shown here?" questions ... unless maybe the
> > > page had some hint that it only monitors sites directly managed by
> > > the Fedora Project, which is why sites like bugzilla, etc., etc.
> > > are not shown here.
>
> We could add something to that effect perhaps.
>
> Another issue is that we don't monitor bugzilla at all. With our other
> services if something goes down, we are paged and the first thing the
> person handling the outage can do is set the status. With no monitoring
> we would depend on someone telling us when things are down and someone
> who can update status being around to act on it. This would lead to
> it's status being out of sync a great deal more than services we
> monitor and manage. ;)
I'm not suggesting you monitor it at all, merely to have this page state that you don't.
--
John Florian
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
