Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:51:22 -0500
> Jon Ciesla <limburgher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> > That makes lots of sense, but I suspect you'll get just as many
>> > "why isn't bugzilla shown here?" questions ... unless maybe the
>> > page had some hint that it only monitors sites directly managed by
>> > the Fedora Project, which is why sites like bugzilla, etc., etc.
>> > are not shown here.
>
> We could add something to that effect perhaps.

+1

> Another issue is that we don't monitor bugzilla at all. With our other
> services if something goes down, we are paged and the first thing the
> person handling the outage can do is set the status. With no monitoring
> we would depend on someone telling us when things are down and someone
> who can update status being around to act on it. This would lead to
> it's status being out of sync a great deal more than services we
> monitor and manage. ;)
>
>
>
>> I see your point, but I'm swayed by Kevin's logic.
>
> :)

Don't get a big head, now. . .;)

-J

> kevin
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux