Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 3.8.2012 21:37, Lennart Poettering napsal(a):
On Fri, 03.08.12 21:10, Panu Matilainen (pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

On 08/03/2012 08:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 03.08.12 14:44, Panu Matilainen (pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

On 08/03/2012 02:02 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2012/8/3 Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Wed, 01.08.12 15:28, Tom Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

A new section on Macros has been added to the Packaging Guidelines,
covering Packaging of Additional RPM Macros.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_of_Additional_RPM_Macros
What's the rationale behind having these in /etc? This is hardly user
configuration, and only ever used if people build their own RPMs. We
really should try harder not to clutter /etc with stuff that is not
configuration.

Why not have this somewhere below /usr?
Because rpm doesn't have a drop-in directory for macros anywhere in
/usr, nobody has asked for one before this, and while I agree on
"/etc admin purity" being a good thing generally, it has not been
(and still isn't) enough of a reason to make it worth the pain for
me to personally drive such a move.
OpenSUSE has this in /usr/lib/rpm/macros instead. Makes a lot of sense
to copy that scheme from them and making the delta between the distros
here a bit smaller.
Ehh? /usr/lib/rpm/macros is and has always been rpm's own "factory
default" configuration *file*. In Suse, Fedora and every rpm based
distro I know of. Suse patches the upstream config directly to suit
their purposes, in Fedora-land the distro defaults are set in
/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros, but that's also a just a file, not a
directory where you can drop in bits and pieces of extra macros from
different packages. Obviously Suse could've added a drop-in macro
directory of their own but looking at their factory rpm sources, I
see no evidence of that.
Oops, sorry, I was misinformed on this one. Still believe it belongs in
/usr though.

Sory for the confusion.

Lennart


I created a ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846679


Vit
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux