Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 09.51 -0400, Adam Jackson ha scritto: > > Fedora is not LSB compatible. Is it? Why do we even care about this at > > all? > > It is if you install redhat-lsb. > > The only intrinsic reason to care about LSB support is binary > compatibility; Fedora broadly doesn't, but that doesn't mean it's not a > useful end. Personally I've definitely had occasion to need older > builds of things like boost and openssl on newer Fedora releases. > > repoquery is also telling me there are things in Fedora that _do_ > require redhat-lsb, at least in F16. I can't speak to the particulars > there, you'd need to look into that per-package. In rawhide, the packages requiring redhat-lsb are: bcfg2-server rear tomcat6 HTH, Nicola -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
