redhat-lsb-desktop versus transition to current libpng

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have been working for the better part of a year on moving Fedora off
of libpng's obsolete 1.2.x release series and onto the current 1.5.x
series.  We are practically there now, and I had hoped to drop libpng
1.2 from the distribution before the F18 branch.  However, I find that
redhat-lsb-desktop still has a dependency on 1.2, and it's not even
because that package contains any PNG-using code; rather, there's a
manually inserted version-specific dependency in the specfile:

%ifarch %{ix86}
Requires: libpng12.so.0
%endif
%ifarch x86_64
Requires: libpng12.so.0()(64bit)
%endif

This is unlike that specfile's treatment of any other library
it requires.  I have been told, at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835777#c8
that the LSB standard requires libpng 1.2, but without any supporting
evidence.  I looked at the underlying ISO documents and don't see any
requirement for libpng at all, let alone 1.2 in particular.  I am
doubtful that every other Linux distro is maintaining this long-obsolete
libpng version, too.

I would like to know how to proceed here.  "You should keep libpng 1.2
around indefinitely, on the basis of no evidence" is not an answer
I intend to accept.

			regards, tom lane
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux