Re: Provenpackager help needed to complete libpng/libtiff transition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 01:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There are still about half a dozen packages left that failed the recent
>> mass rebuild because they contain source-code dependencies on obsolete
>> versions of libpng and/or libtiff.  I've filed patches to fix them,
>> but don't have permissions to do it myself.  If any provenpackagers
>> have a bit of time to spare, could I pester you to look at these bugs?

> Thanks for doing the patches! Have you tried to upstream them, or are
> the upstreams for these dead?

I have not; I supposed that the respective package maintainers would be
in a better position than me to pester their upstreams.  These bugs are
the ones that I've not gotten a response on from the maintainer, so
perhaps the correct question to be asking is whether the Fedora
maintainer is asleep at the wheel ...

			regards, tom lane
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux