Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Haley writes:

On 07/18/2012 02:25 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:

Not exactly.  You said:

> Can you explain, then, the "correctly" approach by which an
> executable can affirm whether another pid is either running the same
> executable, or the post-prelinked version of the same
> executable. Anyone who suggests readlinking /proc/self/exe, then
> the other /proc/pid/exe, and comparing them sans any hardcoded "
> (deleted)" suffix is going to get only howls of laughter, in
> response.

But that's not a use case.  There's no way to know why you want to do
this: why you care that another process is running the exact same
executable.

Because that's the only process I want to talk to. A form of authentication, which I already explained. More than once.

And we've been over this. Right about now, if history's a guide, some self- appointed expert is going to start wagging his finger, mumbling something about ptrace. And completely missing the point.


Attachment: pgpkM5eFbo8rc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux