Re: prelink should not mess with running executables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Chris Adams writes:
> >Is there any value in this "additional check" (that nobody else
> >apparently does)?  Do you not trust the kernel's credential handling?
> 
> I certainly trust it. But just because I trust it, it doesn't mean that any 
> additional checks have no value.

Sure it does.  If the credentials are always correct, additional checks
past that are a waste of cycles.  I ask again: do you have a legitimate
use case?  Is there _any_ case that other checks can succeed that this
invented test of yours would catch?
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux