On 06/19/2012 07:04 AM, Matej Cepl wrote: > On 18/06/12 21:18, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On 06/18/2012 01:43 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> what competition damned? >>> grub is the best example for things which did not reinvented >>> >>> grub1 was easy to understand and configure >> >> And grub1 would get left behind as new filesystems come out and new >> firmwares come out, and potentially new whole architectures come out. > > And what does it have to do with abhorrent configuration files. I am all > for fancy new filesystems, but we do have to have new front-end as well? The problem in cases like this, is that we don't really have a choice. GRUB legacy is unmaintained and increasingly lacking in functionality that is in GRUB2. Since we have made a decision to switch to GRUB2, we have to deal with the configuration format provided by upstream. There are only limited number of components where Fedora or Red Hat has a significant influence and can change this. GRUB2 isn't one of them. So we live with the less than ideal choices at the distribution level. Rahu -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
