Pavel, On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 20:21 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > It is main reason why I request provenpackager rights. In fedora 17 it > was so painful because I several times asks build dependencies and > then ask help to push updates too. > I think in that turn now I can do all that myself, so it should be > smoother. > > As there around 6 security issues, I think update upstream release is > easiest, and furthermore robust way handle it. I've seen you didn't listen to Tomáš's or Kalev's advice on not bumping the ImageMagick's soname in a stable release. Furthermore, you didn't give any warning to the maintainers of the dependent packages (except for the message on this list). In my opinion, being a provenpackager is no excuse for not doing that. Please, use the packagename-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx addresses to send out emails to the appropriate package maintainers. For techne (one of the dependent packages which I maintain) you bumped the release from 0.2.3-2 to 0.2.3-3, which breaks upgrades to F-17 and rawhide. Is there a way to revert the change and make a 0.2.3-2.fc16.1 build? Best regards, Tadej Janež -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
