Re: Update ImageMagick in Fedora 16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



03.06.2012 22:57, Tadej Janež wrote:
Pavel,

On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 20:21 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:

It is main reason why I request provenpackager rights. In fedora 17 it
was so painful because I several times asks build dependencies and
then ask help to push updates too.
I think in that turn now I can do all that myself, so it should be
smoother.

As there around 6 security issues, I think update upstream release is
easiest, and furthermore robust way handle it.
I've seen you didn't listen to Tomáš's or Kalev's advice on not bumping
the ImageMagick's soname in a stable release.

Furthermore, you didn't give any warning to the maintainers of the
dependent packages (except for the message on this list).
In my opinion, being a provenpackager is no excuse for not doing that.
Please, use the packagename-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx addresses to send
out emails to the appropriate package maintainers.
I post message there over week ago. I thought it was sufficient. Provenpackager rights off course do not excuse that or other mistakes. On the contrary it only take me possibility make such tasks without make troubles for others. If I must also write to each maintainer separately - I promise do it next time. Sorry.

For techne (one of the dependent packages which I maintain) you bumped
the release from 0.2.3-2 to 0.2.3-3, which breaks upgrades to F-17 and
rawhide.
Is there a way to revert the change and make a 0.2.3-2.fc16.1 build?
I do not known unfortunately.
Furthermore I've submitted update to testing ta moment read that [1].
May be it possible just update in Fedora 17 too?

Additionally have worth I try read carefully all docs about provenpackager and such updates and have not found how deal with such versions. I had look in my packages and few others and found it was updated many times in that way. In packages were was present subrelease after %{?dist} - I increase it.
Should or must in next time I add it in any package even it does not have it??

I apologize for the inconvenience. Can I help something now?
If you or other will insist I may unpush that update and try patch IM for all issues off course... But I really do not want doing it now.
Best regards,
Tadej Janež



[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nip2-7.28.4-2.fc16,q-7.11-12.fc16,gdl-0.9.2-4.fc16,dx-4.4.4-21.fc16,dmapd-0.0.47-3.fc16,k3d-0.8.0.2-5.fc16,inkscape-0.48.1-10.fc16,zbar-0.10-9.fc16,xine-lib-1.1.20.1-2.fc16,xastir-2.0.0-4.fc16,techne-0.2.3-3.fc16,ruby-RMagick-2.13.1-6.fc16.4,rss-glx-0.9.1.p-10.fc16,psiconv-0.9.8-9.fc16,php-pecl-imagick-3.0.0-10.fc16,php-magickwand-1.0.9-2.fc16,pfstools-1.8.3-3.fc16,oxine-0.7.1-12.fc16,libdmtx-0.7.2-5.fc16,kxstitch-0.8.4.1-7.fc16,calibre-0.8.33-3.fc16,vips-7.28.2-2.fc16,imageinfo-0.05-14.fc16,drawtiming-0.7.1-5.fc16,converseen-0.4.9-2.fc16,autotrace-0.31.1-26.fc16.2,ale-0.9.0.3-6.fc16,ImageMagick-6.7.7.5-1.fc16
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux