Once upon a time, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@xxxxxxxxx> said: > When I create a fork, respin, or remix of Fedora and distribute it to > people it will not run for them like Fedora does without a level of > fiddling which the people advocating this have made clear is entirely > unacceptable. As I understand how this works, respins/remixes of Fedora that use the Fedora boot loader shim, Fedora grub, and Fedora kernel will still be signed and work with Secure Boot enabled. I don't like Secure Boot being forced upon us, but we don't have any real choice in the matter; vendors _are_ going to implement it. Fedora certainly doesn't have sufficient market share to get everybody to include their key (which would still block derived works that change the boot shim/loader and kernel). I'd like to see Fedora as available as possible, and "as possible" means (to me) booting with Secure Boot enabled. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
