Re: another upgrade, another disaster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 10:37 +0200, Caterpillar wrote:

>  I am very disappointed with that, because preupgrade is the official
> supported way to upgrade Fedora versions

Strictly, no. It's *a* supported way.

Frankly, I'd prefer it if we more strongly recommended that people do
DVD/netinst upgrades. That path is less complex than preupgrade and
involves fewer moving parts; it's easier to test and easier to fix and
more likely, in general, to be working at any given point.

I'd put the possible upgrade methods in this order of
likely-to-workness:

1. netinst.iso / DVD.iso with 'updates' repo enabled
2. DVD.iso without 'updates' repo
3. yum *if you follow the instructions carefully*
4. preupgrade
5. yum by the He-Man method ('instructions are for wusses')
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux