On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 12:10 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: > We include wireless device firmware even though it isn't free. And we > don't like doing that, but it is the only way to get wireless support > out of the box in Fedora. Tiny nit: no, it isn't. We could always write free firmware. This isn't impossible, as openfwwf shows. I think the drawing of some kind of comparison between wireless firmware and secure boot is one of the weaker strands of argument the Pro Faction is coming up with, to be honest. It seems to entirely ignore our justification for why non-free firmware is 'okay' - that it's not executed on the host processor. Last I checked, SecureBoot is. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
